Public Demo Space

Sample Evidence Review

Witness statements & timeline conflict

Explore a fictional case the way Runir analyzes real evidence: review the record, follow the timeline, compare contradictions, map people and events, and decide what the evidence supports.

No login required · sample data only

Walk through the case

Runir is showing how it would organize a messy evidence packet. Tap a section to expand it.

Demo: 3 sample cases · 3 files each · read-only
SAMPLE CASE OVERVIEW

Three witnesses describe the same warehouse incident on the night of March 12. Their accounts disagree on time, sequence, and who was present. Run analysis to see facts, contradictions, and timeline reconstruction.

Open Questions
  • Did Hale return to the site between 22:15 and 22:42?
  • Is the security log clock synchronized with the phone-record timestamps?
  • Who else held an active Bay 4 access credential that night?
Evidence in this case
  • Statement — Marcus Hale (Operations Director).pdf · Statement
  • Statement — Priya Anand (Night Supervisor).pdf · Statement
  • Security Log Export — Bay 4 (Mar 12).csv · Report
Why Runir

Runir turns messy records into a structured investigative workspace. Instead of scrolling through disconnected documents, you can move from evidence to facts, timelines, contradictions, entities, citations, and findings in one flow.

  • Follow the timeline
  • Compare conflicting claims
  • Trace every finding back to a source
  • See unresolved questions clearly
Ready to analyze your own evidence?

Create a private workspace to upload documents, run source-backed analysis, build timelines, identify contradictions, and export structured findings.